Olga’s second option

This example assumes that Olga buys a universal life insurance policy with $600,000 face amount. She devotes not just the indexed annual $9000 to the UL, but she also repositions the $60,000 she has saved into the tax-shelter created by the universal life contract. She could select RRSP options also within the universal life policy's investment choices, but let's assume that she doesn't want that. In this case, half of the $9000 she can put aside goes to Revenue Canada, and only the other half is put to work for her within the UL. Using the illustration software of one of the best universal life policies available, the following can be projected if we conservatively assume a modest 8% annual return until she turns 65, and 6% afterwards. As for inflation, we stay with the 3% assumption used previously.

 

  Assumed Rate of Return:

     8% for 23 years, 6% thereafter

 

End| Age |Premium |  Death   | Account  | Cash  | Total  | Bank |Accumulated

of   |          | paid         |  benefit | value      | value  | annual | loan | bank loan

year                                                 charges

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 1   43  64,500.00    668,352     68,352    65,484     906       0         0

 2   44    4,635.00    677,493     77,493    71,757     930       0         0

 3   45    4,774.05    687,496     87,496    78,892     948       0         0

 4   46    4,917.27    705,277     98,417    86,945     984       0         0

 5#  47    5,064.79    750,879   111,920    100,448   1,103       0         0

From year 5, an investor bonus will be credited to her account. Investor bonuses in universal life polices are one of the important factors to universal life insurance illustrations. Almost all companies guarantee some bonus, but the actual value of these varies.

 6#  48    5,216.73    799,167   126,930    115,458   1,244       0         0

 7#  49    5,373.24    818,824   143,621    135,017   1,423       0         0

 8#  50    5,534.43    837,209   162,007    156,271   1,598       0         0

 9#  51    5,700.47    857,380   182,178    179,310   1,787       0         0

Up until year 9, if she wanted to cancel / surrender the policy, she would lose part of her investment. From year 10, however, this penalty disappears, and the cash surrender value will be equal to the account value.

10#  52    5,871.48    879,469   204,267    204,267   2,023       0         0

11#  53    6,047.62    903,683   228,481    228,481   2,246       0         0

12#  54    6,229.05    930,208   255,006    255,006   2,496       0         0

13#  55    6,415.92    959,348   284,146    284,146   2,678       0         0

14#  56    6,608.40    991,338   316,136    316,136   2,888       0         0

15#  57    6,806.65  1,026,486   351,284    351,284   3,077       0         0

16#  58    7,010.85  1,065,044   389,842    389,842   3,326       0         0

17#  59    7,221.18  1,107,396   432,194    432,194   3,536       0         0

18#  60    7,437.81  1,153,865   478,663    478,663   3,799       0         0

19#  61    7,660.95  1,204,862   529,660    529,660   4,062       0         0

20#  62    7,890.78  1,260,819   585,617    585,617   4,346       0         0

21#  63    8,127.50  1,327,646   647,028    647,028   4,630       0         0

22#  64    8,371.33  1,417,127   714,260    714,260   5,081       0         0

23#  65    8,622.47  1,511,314   787,591    787,591   5,819       0         0

When she is 65, she stops contributing to the policy. The next year she starts using the accumulated account value in a tax-effective way. She uses the policy as a collateral, and raises annual loans from a bank to live on. Since a loan is not considered to be earned income, she does not have to pay tax on it. Since the value of the policy is almost 0.8 million, she can easily get the loan at, or very close to, the prime rate. In this example, conservatively again, 7% interest on the bank loan is assumed.

24#  66        0.00  1,592,439   857,815    857,815   6,799 69,075     69,075

25#  67        0.00  1,677,605   933,889    933,889   7,795 71,147   145,058

26#  68        0.00  1,766,774 1,016,125  1,016,125   9,043 73,282   228,493

27#  69        0.00  1,860,177 1,105,001  1,105,001 10,410 75,480   319,968

28#  70        0.00  1,958,046 1,201,066  1,201,066 11,877 77,745   420,110

29#  71        0.00  2,060,781 1,304,969  1,304,969 13,396 80,077   529,595

30#  72        0.00  2,168,635 1,417,376  1,417,376 15,015 82,479   649,145

31#  73        0.00  2,282,716 1,539,578  1,539,578 16,203 84,954   779,539

32#  74        0.00  2,402,868 1,672,060  1,672,060 17,842 87,502   921,609

33#  75        0.00  2,529,764 1,816,067  1,816,067 19,259 90,127 1,076,249

34#  76        0.00  2,663,760 1,972,674  1,972,674 20,730 92,831 1,244,417

35#  77        0.00  2,805,682 2,143,485  2,143,485 21,854 95,616 1,427,143

36#  78        0.00  2,956,039 2,330,068  2,330,068 22,813 98,484 1,625,527

37#  79        0.00  3,115,346 2,534,241  2,534,241 23,519 101,439 1,840,753

38#  80        0.00  3,283,923 2,758,036  2,758,036 23,934 104,482 2,074,088

39#  81        0.00  3,462,274 3,004,008  3,004,008 23,754 107,617 2,326,890

40#  82        0.00  3,651,042 3,275,314  3,275,314 22,645 110,845 2,600,618

41#  83        0.00  3,850,999 3,576,037  3,576,037 20,021 114,170 2,896,831

42#  84        0.00  4,062,223 3,910,662  3,910,662 15,884 117,596 3,217,205

43#  85        0.00  4,384,849 4,284,849  4,284,849   9,532 121,123 3,563,533

Age 85 is an important year again. Olga has about 1 in 2 probability to attain this age. From this on, there will be no insurance charges, as can be seen from the indication of only a nominal administration charge of $126 annually. The so-called face amount of the policy will have been gradually reduced to zero by then, but the tax-shelter remains, and the pending death benefit (that is the account value) is enough to pay back the accumulating bank loan. Even after that, the heirs can get a nice sum of money tax-free.

44#  86        0.00  4,705,700 4,705,700  4,705,700     126 124,757 3,937,737

45#  87        0.00  5,167,900 5,167,900  5,167,900     126 128,500 4,341,879

46#  88        0.00  5,675,510 5,675,510  5,675,510     126 132,355 4,778,165

47#  89        0.00  6,232,993 6,232,993  6,232,993     126 136,325 5,248,962

48#  90        0.00  6,845,248 6,845,248  6,845,248     126 140,415 5,756,805

49#  91        0.00  7,517,657 7,517,657  7,517,657     126 144,628 6,304,409

50#  92        0.00  8,256,130 8,256,130  8,256,130     126 148,967 6,894,684

51#  93        0.00  9,067,157 9,067,157  9,067,157     126 153,436 7,530,748

52#  94        0.00  9,957,868 9,957,868  9,957,868     126 158,039 8,215,939

53#  95        0.00 10,936,090 10,936,090 10,936,090     126 162,780 8,953,834

Olga has 10% chance to live until age 95. If she dies then, and uses only the above cited bank loans, her beneficiaries will get almost 2 million dollars tax-free. The purchasing power of that will be much less than it would be today, of course, but still, ...

54#  96        0.00 12,010,422 12,010,422 12,010,422     126 167,663 9,748,266

55#  97        0.00 13,190,306 13,190,306 13,190,306     126 172,693 10,603,337

56#  98        0.00 14,486,113 14,486,113 14,486,113     126 177,874 11,523,445

57#  99        0.00 15,909,233 15,909,233 15,909,233     126 183,210 12,513,296

58# 100        0.00 17,472,173 17,472,173 17,472,173     126 188,706 13,577,933

As always, read the small print as well: This is an illustration only and NOT A CONTRACT. Rates of return and values contained within are projections only and are NOT GUARANTEES or forecasts of future performance. However, Cost of Insurance used above are fully guaranteed.

Remember, with Option 1, Olga would have used up all her saving by this time. With this option, the cash value of the policy is considerably larger than the accumulated bank loan, therefore, she can continue receiving the same level of annual income (but tax-free in this case!) for as long as she lives. When she dies, the amount of the bank loan will be deducted from the death benefit, and the remaining sum from the death benefit will be paid out tax-free.

Of course, if the annual rate of return is going to be less than the assumed 8% and 6%, then her account value will be less, allowing less bank loan to live on; but even a dismal 6% annual return in the first 23 years would generate more than half a million dollars as account value within the tax-shelter that could be used as a collateral to draw a modest bank loan as long as she lives. Using the same 6% assumption would give really bad results with the Option 1 strategy: She would have used all her money by a much younger age she will quite likely achieve.

Back to Olga

 

Top page (on personal financial planning)

Key areas:

Life and health insurance (including disability, critical illness, and long-term care protection)

If you are / have ...

These web pages are for information purposes only. The information contained and presented, while based on and obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, is not guaranteed either as to its accuracy or completeness. The content of these web pages is solely the work of the author, Laszlo Kramar.

The views (including any recommendations) expressed on these pages are those of the author alone, and they have not been approved by anybody. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer, or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any product discussed or referred to in these web sites. These web pages are for educational purposes only and are not intended for use by residents of the United Sates; nor are they intended as an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction outside of Ontario, Canada. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

(c) Copyright 1997-2006 László Kramár. All Rights Reserved.